Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2022 19 • KG SZ STK 2022 19 Generato dall'IA

State v. [Defendant Names/Appellants] (Assault Conviction Affirmation)

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Two defendants appealed against district court judgments concerning charges of assault. The appellate court reviewed the evidence presented in the initial trial, which included witness testimonies and expert opinions related to the physical altercation. The court reasoned that the evidence sufficiently supported the factual findings of the lower court regarding the participants' actions and the severity of the injuries, ultimately upholding the original convictions and sentences.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

State v. [Defendant Names/Appellants] (Assault Conviction Affirmation): The appellate court reviewed the evidence presented in the initial trial, which included witness testimonies and expert opinions related to the physical altercation. The court reasoned that the evidence sufficiently supported the factual findings of the lower court regarding the participants' actions and the severity of the injuries, ultimately upholding the original convictions and sentences.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
commisurazione della pena testimonianza abbandono per lesioni personali atti penali denuncia mendace valutazione delle prove
Generato dall'IA
STK 2021 16
Assault Conviction Affirmed Despite Sentencing Appeal
BEK 2021 84
State v. Appellant (Assault Appeal)
STK 2022 20
Prosecution Appeal of Assault Conviction
STK 2019 74
State v. [Accused Name]: Appeal of Attempted Aggravated Assault and Affray Conviction
STK 2024 41
Appeal of Simple Assault Conviction Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Urteil vom 18. Juli 2023 \n STK 2022 19 und 21 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichter Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, 2. C.________, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, Beschuldigte, Berufungsführer und Anschlussberufungsgegner, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, SSB, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde, Berufungsgegnerin und Anschlussberufungsführerin, |\n

\n\n

\n vertreten durch Staatsanwalt E.________, \n

\n\n| | |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Angriff |\n \n\n

\n (Berufungen und Anschlussberufungen gegen die Urteile des Bezirksgerichts March vom 3. Februar 2022, SGO 21 3 und SGO 21 4);-

\n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: