Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2022 18 • KG SZ STK 2022 18 Generato dall'IA

Private Plaintiff v. Accused and Public Prosecutor's Office (Negligent Bodily Harm Appeal)

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant, as the private plaintiff, appealed a lower court's judgment concerning negligent bodily harm against the accused and the public prosecutor's office. The appellate court, considering the matter before it, upheld the lower court's decision. The reasoning for the court's decision, which is not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt but concluded with the outcome, resulted in the appeal being dismissed or the original judgment being affirmed regarding the charge of negligent bodily harm.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private Plaintiff v. Accused and Public Prosecutor's Office (Negligent Bodily Harm Appeal): The appellate court, considering the matter before it, upheld the lower court's decision. The reasoning for the court's decision, which is not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt but concluded with the outcome, resulted in the appeal being dismissed or the original judgment being affirmed regarding the charge of negligent bodily harm.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lesioni colpose azione penale privata omissione del ministero pubblico quantificazione del danno assicurazione infortuni privata azione di reintegra fahrlässige Körperverletzung | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 67
Plaintiff v. Prosecutor: Negligent Serious Bodily Harm Appeal
BEK 2017 84
Appeal of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Bodily Injury and Legal Aid
STK 2016 47
Complainant v. Defendant (Negligent Bodily Harm Appeal)
BEK 2021 139
Private Complainant v. Prosecutor (Negligent Bodily Harm)
STK 2018 24
Private Prosecution Appeal: Negligent Grievous Bodily Harm Acquittal Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 24. Mai 2022 \n STK 2022 18 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. C.________, Beschuldigte und Berufungsgegnerin, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n fahrlässige Körperverletzung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Küssnacht vom 17. Februar 2022, SEO 2021 5);- \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass