Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2022 17 • KG SZ STK 2022 17 Generato dall'IA

Appeal and Cross-Appeal in Negligent Traffic Violation Case

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal and cross-appeal against a lower court's judgment regarding the negligent simple violation of a traffic regulation. The appellate court reviewed the appeal filed by the prosecution and the cross-appeal filed by the private plaintiff, both challenging the initial decision concerning the accused's liability for the traffic infraction. The court ultimately reached its decision based on its assessment of the facts established in the lower court proceedings and the applicable legal standards concerning the charge of negligent traffic violation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 433 StPO, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal and Cross-Appeal in Negligent Traffic Violation Case: The appellate court reviewed the appeal filed by the prosecution and the cross-appeal filed by the private plaintiff, both challenging the initial decision concerning the accused's liability for the traffic infraction. The court ultimately reached its decision based on its assessment of the facts established in the lower court proceedings and the applicable legal standards concerning the charge of negligent traffic violation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
infrazione alle norme della circolazione accollo delle spese infrazione commessa per negligenza incidenti della circolazione stradale istanza di autorizzazione all’esecuzione – Decisione diritto dei trasporti fahrlässige Körperverletzung | Strafgesetzbuch

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
The court applied this provision regarding the allocation of court costs for the appeal.
Art. 433 StPO
The court applied this provision regarding the decision on compensation for the defense costs of the appellant (Staatsanwaltschaft).
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The court applied this provision for the allocation of court costs for the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2023 82
Appeal Regarding Traffic Violation Judgment
STK 2025 10
Appeal of Traffic Violation Judgment
BEK 2020 11
Negligent Traffic Violation Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Allocation
STK 2022 39
Appeal of Traffic Violation Conviction
BEK 2016 189
Traffic Offenses Appeal: Negligence and Speeding

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The court applied this provision regarding the allocation of court costs for the appeal.

Art. 433 StPO

The court applied this provision regarding the decision on compensation for the defense costs of the appellant (Staatsanwaltschaft).

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court applied this provision for the allocation of court costs for the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 19. Mai 2023 \n STK 2022 17 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin A.________, gegen 1. B.________, Beschuldigte, Berufungsund Anschlussberufungsgegnerin, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin, Berufungsgegnerin und Anschlussberufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n fahrlässige einfache Verletzung einer Verkehrsregel |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Küssnacht vom 17. Februar 2022, SEO 2021 5);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: