Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2021 7 • KG SZ STK 2021 7 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Professional Fraud Conviction Upheld

Numero d'incarto STK 2021 7
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal by the accused against a conviction for professional fraud. The appellant contested the lower court's factual findings and legal assessment regarding the repeated commission of acts constituting commercial deception. The appellate court reviewed the evidence, including testimony and documentation, and ultimately upheld the conviction, reasoning that the appellant's actions demonstrated the necessary elements of habitual or professional fraudulent conduct as defined by law, thereby confirming the original sentence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Professional Fraud Conviction Upheld: The appellant contested the lower court's factual findings and legal assessment regarding the repeated commission of acts constituting commercial deception. The appellate court reviewed the evidence, including testimony and documentation, and ultimately upheld the conviction, reasoning that the appellant's actions demonstrated the necessary elements of habitual or professional fraudulent conduct as defined by law, thereby confirming the original sentence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
truffa per mestiere truffa valutazione delle prove procedimento per falsità violazione dei doveri professionali legittimazione a ricorrere gewerbsmässiger Betrug (Art. 146 Abs. 1 und 2 StGB) | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
STK 2017 7
Commercial Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal
STK 2016 36
Commercial Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal
STK 2021 50
Appeal of Habitual Fraud and Forgery Conviction Upheld
STK 2019 30
Appeal Concerning Conviction for Fraud and Document Forgery
STK 2016 19
Appeal of Financial Misconduct Conviction Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 1. Februar 2022 \n STK 2021 7 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, \n vertreten durch E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | \n betreffend · \n gewerbsmässiger Betrug (