Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2021 20 • KG SZ STK 2021 20 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Extortion and Coercion Conviction

Numero d'incarto STK 2021 20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant was convicted by the lower court for offenses including extortion and coercion, prompting an appeal against that judgment. The appellate court reviewed the case, considering the initial findings and the arguments presented by the appellant and the opposing parties, ultimately rendering a decision on the appeal without detailing the specific grounds for affirming or overturning the prior verdict in this excerpt.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO; Appeal of Extortion and Coercion Conviction: The appellate court reviewed the case, considering the initial findings and the arguments presented by the appellant and the opposing parties, ultimately rendering a decision on the appeal without detailing the specific grounds for affirming or overturning the prior verdict in this excerpt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
estorsione commisurazione della pena caso grave reati contro la sicurezza dei rapporti giuridici impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio motivo di revisione Erpressung, Nötigung etc. | Strafgesetzbuch

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO

The court used this provision to decide on the appeal by upholding the first instance judgment.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

This provision was applied to order the appellant to bear the procedural costs of the appeal proceedings.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision was used to order the appellant to pay compensation to the private parties (Appellees 2, 3, and 4).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 29. Juni 2021 \n STK 2021 20 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Postfach 75, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, 3. F.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, 4. G.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch H.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Erpressung, Nötigung etc. |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 18. Januar 2021, SGO 2020 14);- \n \n \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: