Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2021 18 • KG SZ STK 2021 18 Generato dall'IA

Negligent Serious Harm Appeal After Acquittal

Numero d'incarto STK 2021 18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private claimant appealed a district court's judgment regarding charges of negligent serious bodily harm and endangering safety by violating construction rules, where the claimant sought to have the defendant convicted after an initial acquittal. The Cantonal Court dismissed the appeal because the lower court's finding that the defendant did not have sufficient knowledge or control over the dangerous construction activity to establish criminal liability was factually sound and not demonstrably incorrect, meaning the required elements for both offenses were not proven against the accused.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Negligent Serious Harm Appeal After Acquittal: The Cantonal Court dismissed the appeal because the lower court's finding that the defendant did not have sufficient knowledge or control over the dangerous construction activity to establish criminal liability was factually sound and not demonstrably incorrect, meaning the required elements for both offenses were not proven against the accused.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lesioni colpose responsabilità dell'architetto errore giudiziario contravvenzione per violazione edilizia caso poco grave quantificazione del danno
Generato dall'IA
STK 2023 29
Appeal of Convictions for Negligent Grievous Bodily Harm and Endangerment
STK 2020 49
Appeal of Negligent Serious Bodily Harm Acquittal Dismissed
STK 2016 47
Complainant v. Defendant (Negligent Bodily Harm Appeal)
STK 2020 37
Appeal of Acquittal for Simple Bodily Harm
STK 2017 74
Prosecution Appeal on Negligent Harm Acquittal and Costs

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 6. August 2021 \n STK 2021 18 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. C.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsgegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n fahrlässige schwere Körperverletzung, Gefährdung durch Verletzung der Regeln der Baukunde |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts March vom 8. Oktober 2020, SGO 2019 10);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: