Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2021 10 • KG SZ STK 2021 10 Generato dall'IA

Multiple Offense Appeals Regarding Defamation and Coercion

Numero d'incarto STK 2021 10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a district court judgment concerning multiple counts of defamation, insult, violation of the secrecy of correspondence, attempted coercion, and repeated trespassing, with both the accused and a private party filing appeals. The court's reasoning, which would follow the initial factual description, is reserved for the subsequent sections of the full judgment, but the decision addresses the complex interplay of these multiple offenses stemming from the underlying factual situation contested through the appeals.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Multiple Offense Appeals Regarding Defamation and Coercion: The court's reasoning, which would follow the initial factual description, is reserved for the subsequent sections of the full judgment, but the decision addresses the complex interplay of these multiple offenses stemming from the underlying factual situation contested through the appeals.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diffamazione tentata coazione ingiuria reati contro la sicurezza dei rapporti giuridici obbligo di articolare le censure azione legale a scopo intimidatorio
Generato dall'IA
STK 2021 25
Coercion and Defamation Appeals and Cross-Appeals
STK 2020 45
Appeal of Conviction for Multiple Offenses Including Domestic Violence and Threats Against Officials
STK 2023 27
Appeal Regarding Criminal Charges and Property Disputes
STK 2016 28
Appeal Regarding Conviction for Threats, Harm, Battery, Insult, and Weapons Violation
STK 2018 44
Affirmation of Conviction for Attempted Coercion, Slander, and Insult

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 8. März 2022 \n STK 2021 10 und 11 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsführer und Berufungsgegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin, Berufungsgegnerin und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n mehrfache üble Nachrede, Beschimpfung, mehrfache Verletzung des Schriftgeheimnisses, versuchte Nötigung, mehrfacher Hausfriedensbruch, |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufungen gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Gersau vom 3. Dezember 2020, SGO 2020 01);- \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: