Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2020 9 • KG SZ STK 2020 9 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Intentional Driving Under the Influence Conviction

Numero d'incarto STK 2020 9
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant, convicted of intentional driving under the influence, appealed a lower court's judgment. The court, in its decision dated March 2, 2020, addressed the appeal concerning the conviction for operating a vehicle while impaired. The summary of the reasoning is not explicitly detailed in the provided text snippet, as the text only introduces the parties, the subject matter (intentional driving under the influence), and the procedural history (appeal against the District Court's judgment of November 26, 2019).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Intentional Driving Under the Influence Conviction: The court, in its decision dated March 2, 2020, addressed the appeal concerning the conviction for operating a vehicle while impaired. The summary of the reasoning is not explicitly detailed in the provided text snippet, as the text only introduces the parties, the subject matter (intentional driving under the influence), and the procedural history (appeal against the District Court's judgment of November 26, 2019).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
guida recidiva in stato di ebbrezza dolo penale infrazione alle norme della circolazione guida nonostante revoca della patente decisione motivata detenzione di stupefacenti
Generato dall'IA
STK 2023 19
State v. Appellant (DUI Affirmation)
STK 2018 41
State v. Defendant (Driving While Impaired Appeal)
STK 2019 45
Appeal of Impaired Driving Conviction Upheld
STK 2022 8
Prosecution Appeal on Aiding and Abetting Driving While Intoxicated
STK 2017 65
Prosecution Appeal in Drunk Driving/Traffic Violation Case

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 2. März 2020 \n STK 2020 9 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n vorsätzliches Fahren in fahrunfähigem Zustand |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 26. November 2019, SEO 2019 10);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n