Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2020 7 • KG SZ STK 2020 7 Generato dall'IA

Plaintiffs v. Public Prosecutor Regarding Slander Appeal Inadmissibility

Numero d'incarto STK 2020 7
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Two private plaintiffs appealed a district court's decision concerning charges of slander, potentially defamation, against a defendant, with the public prosecutor's office also involved as an opposing party. The appellate court, in its ruling, ultimately upheld the lower court's decision by finding the appeal to be inadmissible, implying the plaintiffs failed to meet the procedural requirements or substantive grounds necessary for the higher court to overturn the original judgment regarding the alleged slanderous statements.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Plaintiffs v. Public Prosecutor Regarding Slander Appeal Inadmissibility: The appellate court, in its ruling, ultimately upheld the lower court's decision by finding the appeal to be inadmissible, implying the plaintiffs failed to meet the procedural requirements or substantive grounds necessary for the higher court to overturn the original judgment regarding the alleged slanderous statements.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diffamazione impugnabilità di decisioni incidentali ricusazione di pubblici ministeri autorizzazione ad agire imputabilità ad una persona giuridica di diritto pubblico eccezione di incostituzionalità
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 33
Private Appeal of Refusal to Prosecute Defamation Upheld
STK 2020 30
Private Prosecutor's Appeal on Defamation Conviction and Acquittal
BEK 2021 34
Complainant Appeal of Decision Not to Prosecute Defamation
BEK 2019 34
Private Complainant v. Prosecutor (Slander Prosecution Time Limit)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 27. Februar 2020 \n STK 2020 7 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsführer, 2. B.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsführerin, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt D.________, 2. E.________, Beschuldigte und Berufungsgegnerin, verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt F.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n üble Nachrede, evtl. Verleumdung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Küssnacht vom 8. November 2019, SGO 2019 1);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: