Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Theft, Trespass, Property Damage, Deportation Appeal)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case involved an appeal by the public prosecutor's office against a lower court's judgment concerning theft, trespass, property damage, and deportation, where the accused was the respondent and several private parties were also respondents. The cantonal court president's decision, dated June 18, 2020, addresses the appeal concerning the prior ruling from December 19, 2019, regarding these criminal offenses, without detailing the specific facts or the court's reasoning in the provided excerpt, as the text cuts off before the substantive findings.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 433 StPO; Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Theft, Trespass, Property Damage, Deportation Appeal): The cantonal court president's decision, dated June 18, 2020, addresses the appeal concerning the prior ruling from December 19, 2019, regarding these criminal offenses, without detailing the specific facts or the court's reasoning in the provided excerpt, as the text cuts off before the substantive findings.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision was used to order the appellant (Staatsanwaltschaft) to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.
This provision was cited in relation to the distribution of costs and compensation for the respondent's expenses.
Testo completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 18. Juni 2020 \n STK 2020 35 \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin A.________, gegen 1. B.________, Beschuldigte und Berufungsgegnerin, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, 3. E.________, 4. F.________, 5. G.________, 6. H.________, 7. I.________, 8. J.________, 9. K.________, Ziff. 2-9 Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner |\n
\n|\n betreffend |\n Diebstahl, Hausfriedensbruch, Sachbeschädigung, Landesverweis |\n \n\n
\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts vom 19. Dezember 2019, SGO 2019 26);- \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: