Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2020 3 • KG SZ STK 2020 3 Generato dall'IA

Private Prosecution Appeal of Property Damage Acquittal

Numero d'incarto STK 2020 3
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal filed by a private prosecutor against the acquittal of a defendant by the District Court concerning a charge of property damage. The appellate court, considering the evidence presented during the appeal, upheld the lower court's decision, implying that the evidence presented was insufficient to overturn the acquittal for property damage against the accused party.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private Prosecution Appeal of Property Damage Acquittal: The appellate court, considering the evidence presented during the appeal, upheld the lower court's decision, implying that the evidence presented was insufficient to overturn the acquittal for property damage against the accused party.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale privata proprietà privata danneggiamento legittimazione a ricorrere prova liberatoria azione mobiliare Sachbeschädigung | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 87
Private Party Appeal of Criminal Dismissal for Assault and Property Damage
STK 2019 33
Appeal Regarding Damages Following Partial Acquittal in Bodily Harm and Trespass Case
STK 2020 30
Private Prosecutor's Appeal on Defamation Conviction and Acquittal
STK 2020 2
Property Damage Appeal Affirmed
BEK 2021 54
Appeal Against Discontinuance of Property Damage Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 29. April 2020 \n STK 2020 3 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigte und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Sachbeschädigung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Küssnacht vom 26. September 2019, SEO 2019 3);- \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: