Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2020 20 • KG SZ STK 2020 20 Generato dall'IA

State v. [Appellant's Name] (Attempted Coercion and Traffic Violations Appeal)

Numero d'incarto STK 2020 20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a conviction from the lower court concerning multiple counts of attempted coercion and intentional violation of traffic regulations brought against the appellant. The appellant sought the reversal of this conviction through an appeal. The court's decision, based on the facts presented, upheld the lower court's judgment, finding the appellant guilty of the specified offenses.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; State v. [Appellant's Name] (Attempted Coercion and Traffic Violations Appeal): The appellant sought the reversal of this conviction through an appeal. The court's decision, based on the facts presented, upheld the lower court's judgment, finding the appellant guilty of the specified offenses.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
infrazione alle norme della circolazione tentata coazione reati contro la sicurezza dei rapporti giuridici istanza di autorizzazione all’esecuzione – Decisione controllo della commisurazione della pena natura dell'infrazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
This provision was used to reject the appeal in the final order.
Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO
This procedural rule was applied in conjunction with the costs ruling.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This provision governs the imposition of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2016 21
State v. Accused (Traffic Violations and Coercion Appeal)
STK 2018 28
State v. [Defendant Name] (Traffic Violation Appeal)
STK 2022 39
Appeal of Traffic Violation Conviction
BEK 2023 104
Appellant v. State: Upholding Conviction for Disobedience and Traffic Violations
STK 2017 8
State v. Defendant (Traffic Violations Appeal)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

This provision was used to reject the appeal in the final order.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO

This procedural rule was applied in conjunction with the costs ruling.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision governs the imposition of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 4. Mai 2020 \n STK 2020 20 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigte und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n mehrfache versuchte Nötigung, mehrfache vorsätzliche Verletzung von Verkehrsregeln |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Schwyz vom 18. Dezember 2019, SGO 2019 5);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: