Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2020 2 • KG SZ STK 2020 2 Generato dall'IA

Property Damage Appeal Affirmed

Numero d'incarto STK 2020 2
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant, a private plaintiff, appealed a district court's judgment concerning a charge of property damage against the accused. The court of appeal, reviewing the lower court's decision, ultimately upheld the original judgment because the appeal lacked merit regarding the established facts and legal assessment, affirming the lower court's conclusion regarding the property damage case.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Property Damage Appeal Affirmed: The court of appeal, reviewing the lower court's decision, ultimately upheld the original judgment because the appeal lacked merit regarding the established facts and legal assessment, affirming the lower court's conclusion regarding the property damage case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
proprietà privata quantificazione del danno interpretazione della sentenza esame nel merito legittimazione a ricorrere azione mobiliare
Generato dall'IA
STK 2020 3
Private Prosecution Appeal of Property Damage Acquittal
STK 2020 42
Property Damage Conviction Affirmation
ZK1 2021 44
Property Vindication Appeal Upheld
STK 2019 70
Appeal Confirmation of Property Damage and Fare Evasion Conviction
STK 2019 33
Appeal Regarding Damages Following Partial Acquittal in Bodily Harm and Trespass Case

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 29. April 2020 \n STK 2020 2 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Sachbeschädigung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Küssnacht vom 26. September 2019, SEO 2019 2);- \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: