Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2020 12 • KG SZ STK 2020 12 Generato dall'IA

Dangerous Driving Appeal Upheld

Numero d'incarto STK 2020 12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal by a defendant against a prior ruling concerning charges of dangerous driving and other offenses, where the private party was the opposing party. The court was tasked with reviewing the findings of the initial decision, which likely related to the established facts of the dangerous driving incident and subsequent legal classification. The appellate court ultimately upheld the original judgment, reasoning that the evidence sufficiently supported the conviction for the established offenses, thereby rejecting the grounds for the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Dangerous Driving Appeal Upheld: The court was tasked with reviewing the findings of the initial decision, which likely related to the established facts of the dangerous driving incident and subsequent legal classification. The appellate court ultimately upheld the original judgment, reasoning that the evidence sufficiently supported the conviction for the established offenses, thereby rejecting the grounds for the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
reati connessi guida in stato di inattitudine infrazione al codice della strada guida in stato di ebbrezza qualificata impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio gravità dell'infortunio
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 45
Appeal of Impaired Driving Conviction Upheld
BEK 2018 116
Traffic Violation Conviction Appeal Upheld
STK 2020 52
Traffic Violation Conviction Appeal Upheld
STK 2020 41
Traffic Violation and Negligence Conviction Upheld on Appeal
STK 2018 28
State v. [Defendant Name] (Traffic Violation Appeal)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 15. Oktober 2020 \n STK 2020 12 und 13 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutman, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n sowie \n \n