Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2018 6 • KG SZ STK 2018 6 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Neglect of Maintenance Obligations

Numero d'incarto STK 2018 6
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private litigant appealed a decision related to the neglect of maintenance obligations, which was brought against a defendant and the public prosecutor's office. The appellate court considered the arguments presented by the private litigant and the opposing parties regarding the alleged failure to meet financial support duties. The court reached its decision based on its interpretation and application of the relevant law concerning the breach of a legally imposed duty to provide maintenance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 422 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO; Appeal Regarding Neglect of Maintenance Obligations: The appellate court considered the arguments presented by the private litigant and the opposing parties regarding the alleged failure to meet financial support duties. The court reached its decision based on its interpretation and application of the relevant law concerning the breach of a legally imposed duty to provide maintenance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
trascuranza degli obblighi di mantenimento diritto delle obbligazioni interpretazione del diritto doveri del ministero pubblico assistenza giudiziaria in materia civile perizia giuridica Vernachlässigung von Unterhaltspflichten (Art. 217 StGB) | Strafgesetzbuch

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 422 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The appeal was dismissed based on this provision, meaning the appeal ground was rejected.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

The court applied this provision regarding the decision on the appeal concerning the main subject matter.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

This provision was used to impose the procedural costs upon the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 2. März 2018 \n STK 2018 6 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsführerin, gegen 1. B.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin D.________, 3. E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n betreffend · \n Vernachlässigung von Unterhaltspflichten (