Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2018 50 • KG SZ STK 2018 50 Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. State: Appeal Against Theft and Trespassing Conviction

Numero d'incarto STK 2018 50
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant was convicted by the District Court for theft, multiple counts of trespassing, repeated violation of exclusion/entry orders, and minor theft, leading to an appeal against this judgment. The Cantonal Court ultimately rejected the appeal because the evidence presented during the trial sufficiently supported the lower court's findings regarding the objective and subjective elements of the charged offenses, thereby validating the initial conviction and sentence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. State: Appeal Against Theft and Trespassing Conviction: The Cantonal Court ultimately rejected the appeal because the evidence presented during the trial sufficiently supported the lower court's findings regarding the objective and subjective elements of the charged offenses, thereby validating the initial conviction and sentence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
furto di minore entità prova oggettiva delitto contro i beni sequestro di mezzi di prova porto abusivo di armi diritto di togliere le addizioni
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 17. Dezember 2018 \n STK 2018 50 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________ AG, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Diebstahl, mehrfacher Hausfriedensbruch, mehrfache Missachtung der Einund Ausgrenzung, geringfügiger Diebstahl |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Schwyz vom 24. Oktober 2018, SGO 2018 4);- \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n