Appellant v. State: Appeal Against Theft and Trespassing Conviction
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant was convicted by the District Court for theft, multiple counts of trespassing, repeated violation of exclusion/entry orders, and minor theft, leading to an appeal against this judgment. The Cantonal Court ultimately rejected the appeal because the evidence presented during the trial sufficiently supported the lower court's findings regarding the objective and subjective elements of the charged offenses, thereby validating the initial conviction and sentence.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppellant v. State: Appeal Against Theft and Trespassing Conviction: The Cantonal Court ultimately rejected the appeal because the evidence presented during the trial sufficiently supported the lower court's findings regarding the objective and subjective elements of the charged offenses, thereby validating the initial conviction and sentence.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 17. Dezember 2018 \n STK 2018 50 \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________ AG, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, |\n
\n|\n betreffend |\n Diebstahl, mehrfacher Hausfriedensbruch, mehrfache Missachtung der Einund Ausgrenzung, geringfügiger Diebstahl |\n
\n\n
\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Schwyz vom 24. Oktober 2018, SGO 2018 4);- \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n