Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2018 44 • KG SZ STK 2018 44 Generato dall'IA

Affirmation of Conviction for Attempted Coercion, Slander, and Insult

Numero d'incarto STK 2018 44
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a conviction for multiple counts of attempted coercion, slander, and insult. The lower court had found the accused guilty of these offenses, which stemmed from a series of incidents. The appellate court, after reviewing the facts and legal considerations, upheld the initial verdict, thereby affirming the conviction against the appellant for the stated crimes.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 427 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO; Affirmation of Conviction for Attempted Coercion, Slander, and Insult: The lower court had found the accused guilty of these offenses, which stemmed from a series of incidents. The appellate court, after reviewing the facts and legal considerations, upheld the initial verdict, thereby affirming the conviction against the appellant for the stated crimes.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tentata coazione verdetto di colpevolezza ingiuria valutazione delle prove denuncia mendace esame delle censure formali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 427 Abs. 1 StPO
The appeal is rejected because the complaints regarding the factual findings and the assessment of evidence are unfounded.
Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO
The appeal is rejected, confirming the decision under appeal.
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
The appellant is ordered to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2018 27
Appeal of Slander Conviction Upheld
STK 2023 78
Appeal of Conviction for Threat and Insult
STK 2017 68
State v. [Appellant Name] - Upholding Conviction for Threats, Insult, and Harassment
STK 2021 25
Coercion and Defamation Appeals and Cross-Appeals
STK 2019 4
State v. Accused (Appeal of Acquittal for Attempted Coercion and Incitement)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 427 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal is rejected because the complaints regarding the factual findings and the assessment of evidence are unfounded.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal is rejected, confirming the decision under appeal.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

The appellant is ordered to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 10. November 2020 \n STK 2018 44 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt \n Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n mehrfache versuchte Nötigung, mehrfache üble Nachrede, mehrfache Beschimpfung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Einsiedeln vom 30. August 2018, SEO 2018 004);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: