Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2018 43 • KG SZ STK 2018 43 Generato dall'IA

Criminal Appeal on Multiple Charges

Numero d'incarto STK 2018 43
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal by the accused against a criminal court judgment concerning numerous charges including attempted grievous bodily harm, property damage, threats, trespassing, violence against officials, battery, theft, insult, narcotics law violations, animal cruelty, and disobedience to authority. The appellate court's decision, rendered by the Cantonal Court President, addresses the appeal filed by the defendant, represented by defense counsel, against the initial judgment, with the cantonal public prosecutor's office and several private parties listed as opposing parties in the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Criminal Appeal on Multiple Charges: The appellate court's decision, rendered by the Cantonal Court President, addresses the appeal filed by the defendant, represented by defense counsel, against the initial judgment, with the cantonal public prosecutor's office and several private parties listed as opposing parties in the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tentativo nel diritto penale minaccia lesioni personali patrocinatore di controparte contravvenzione alla legge federale sugli stupefacenti impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio Körperverletzung, Sachbeschädigung, Drohung etc. | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 27. November 2018 \n STK 2018 43 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, 3. F.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 4. G.________ GmbH, \n Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n versuchte schwere Körperverletzung, mehrfache Sachbeschädigung, Drohung, Hausfriedensbruch, mehrfache Gewalt und Drohung gegen Behörden und Beamte, Tätlichkeit, mehrfacher Diebstahl, mehrfache Beschimpfung, BetmG, Tierquälerei, Übertretung des Personenbeförderungsgesetzes, Störung des Polizeidienstes (kant. StrafG), Ungehorsam im Sinne des BGST |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts vom 24. August 2018, SGO 2018 3);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: