Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2018 39 • KG SZ STK 2018 39 Generato dall'IA

Traffic Violation and Culpable Conduct Appeal Affirmation

Numero d'incarto STK 2018 39
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant was convicted by the lower court for gross violation of traffic regulations and culpable conduct following an accident. The appeal challenged this conviction, but the appellate court upheld the original judgment, reasoning that the established facts demonstrated a clear and serious breach of mandatory traffic rules by the appellant, justifying the initial conviction for the traffic offense and subsequent conduct related to the accident.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Traffic Violation and Culpable Conduct Appeal Affirmation: The appeal challenged this conviction, but the appellate court upheld the original judgment, reasoning that the established facts demonstrated a clear and serious breach of mandatory traffic rules by the appellant, justifying the initial conviction for the traffic offense and subsequent conduct related to the accident.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
infrazione alle norme della circolazione condotta colpevole disposizioni imperative e legge del contratto incidenti della circolazione stradale guida nonostante revoca della patente natura dell'infrazione
Generato dall'IA
STK 2024 8
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld on Appeal
STK 2020 41
Traffic Violation and Negligence Conviction Upheld on Appeal
STK 2024 9
Appeal of Gross Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld
STK 2020 52
Traffic Violation Conviction Appeal Upheld
STK 2017 71
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld on Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 26. März 2019 \n STK 2018 39 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n grobe Verletzung der Verkehrsregeln, pflichtwidriges Verhalten bei Unfall |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil der Kammer 1 des Bezirksgerichts March vom 15. Juni 2018, SGO 2018 1);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: