Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2018 23 • KG SZ STK 2018 23 Generato dall'IA

Speed Camera Evidence Upheld in Insufficient Distance Appeal

Numero d'incarto STK 2018 23
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant was convicted of a serious traffic violation for insufficient distance based on evidence derived from a speed camera analysis, where the initial calculation of the distance between the vehicles was contested on appeal. The court upheld the conviction, reasoning that the technical evidence, established through expert analysis of the camera footage and vehicle data, sufficiently demonstrated the inadequate separation between the vehicles as required by traffic regulations, thereby rejecting the appellant's challenges to the methodology and the resulting finding of guilt.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Speed Camera Evidence Upheld in Insufficient Distance Appeal: The court upheld the conviction, reasoning that the technical evidence, established through expert analysis of the camera footage and vehicle data, sufficiently demonstrated the inadequate separation between the vehicles as required by traffic regulations, thereby rejecting the appellant's challenges to the methodology and the resulting finding of guilt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
superamento del limite di velocità prove acquisite tramite sorveglianza abbandono del procedimento per infrazione stradale inutilizzabilità delle prove illecite fissazione della multa incidenti della circolazione stradale grobe Verkehrsregelverletzung (ungenügender Abstand) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2017 78
Speeding Conviction Affirmed Due to Reliable Speed Measurement
BEK 2018 48
Speeding Conviction Upheld on Radar Evidence Reliability
STK 2017 1
Dashcam Footage Inadmissibility and Acquittal for Traffic Offense
BEK 2018 77
Speeding Conviction Upheld Despite Challenge to Measurement Device Accuracy
STK 2016 51
Speed Limit Violation Calibration Challenge Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 27. November 2018 \n STK 2018 23 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n grobe Verkehrsregelverletzung (ungenügender Abstand) |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 5. Februar 2018, SEO 2017 28);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: