Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2018 17 • KG SZ STK 2018 17 Generato dall'IA

Defendant v. State: Affirmation of Fraud and Forgery Conviction

Numero d'incarto STK 2018 17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a conviction for attempted fraud, document forgery, and misleading the administration of justice brought by a defendant. The court, after considering the appeal against the lower court's judgment, ultimately confirmed the previous decision, upholding the original conviction based on the evidence and legal assessment presented in the case concerning the specified criminal acts.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Defendant v. State: Affirmation of Fraud and Forgery Conviction: The court, after considering the appeal against the lower court's judgment, ultimately confirmed the previous decision, upholding the original conviction based on the evidence and legal assessment presented in the case concerning the specified criminal acts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
falsità in documenti tentata truffa valutazione delle prove amministrazione della giustizia sequestro di mezzi di prova procedura di revisione penale
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 30
Appeal Concerning Conviction for Fraud and Document Forgery
STK 2016 27
State v. [Appellant Name] (Theft Conviction Affirmation)
STK 2021 39
Appeal Dismissed: Upholding Document Forgery Conviction
STK 2023 21
State v. Defendant (Embezzlement, Forgery, and Fraud Appeal)
STK 2021 50
Appeal of Habitual Fraud and Forgery Conviction Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Urteil vom 30. Oktober 2018 \n STK 2018 17 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Bettina Krienbühl, Dr. Stephan Zurfluh und Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutmann, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n versuchter Betrug, Urkundenfälschung, Irreführung der Rechtspflege |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des kantonalen Strafgerichts vom 18. Januar 2018, SGO 2017 23);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: