Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2018 10 • KG SZ STK 2018 10 Generato dall'IA

State v. [Defendant's Name] Appeal Dismissal

Numero d'incarto STK 2018 10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a prior conviction for theft and driving without a license, challenging the factual findings and sentencing of the lower court. The appellate court reviewed the evidence presented, including witness testimonies and documentary proof, and determined that the initial verdict was based on a sound and comprehensive assessment of the facts and the applicable law, leading to the conclusion that the appeal lacked merit and should be dismissed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 433 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO, Art. 62 Abs. 3 StPO; State v. [Defendant's Name] Appeal Dismissal: The appellate court reviewed the evidence presented, including witness testimonies and documentary proof, and determined that the initial verdict was based on a sound and comprehensive assessment of the facts and the applicable law, leading to the conclusion that the appeal lacked merit and should be dismissed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenziamento per furto commisurazione della pena valutazione delle prove abbandono del procedimento per infrazione stradale impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio testimonianza Diebstahl, vorsätzliches Fahren ohne Berechtigung, etc. | Strafgesetzbuch

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
The court confirmed the appeal concerning the criminal penalty, which implies that the ground for appeal regarding the penalty was partially accepted.
Art. 433 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
The court used this article to dismiss the appeal regarding the private party's claim for damages.
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO
The court used this article regarding the costs of the proceedings because the appeal was only partially accepted.
Art. 62 Abs. 3 StPO
The court used this article to assess the distribution of court costs concerning the private party's claim.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2017 53
State v. Defendant: Appeal of Driving Without License Conviction
STK 2019 36
Prosecution v. Defendant (Driving Without a License Appeal)
STK 2018 41
State v. Defendant (Driving While Impaired Appeal)
STK 2019 60
Appeal of Driving Without License Conviction Upheld
STK 2018 28
State v. [Defendant Name] (Traffic Violation Appeal)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The court confirmed the appeal concerning the criminal penalty, which implies that the ground for appeal regarding the penalty was partially accepted.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The court used this article to dismiss the appeal regarding the private party's claim for damages.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

The court used this article regarding the costs of the proceedings because the appeal was only partially accepted.

Art. 62 Abs. 3 StPO

The court used this article to assess the distribution of court costs concerning the private party's claim.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 13. September 2018 \n STK 2018 10 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Walter Christen. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Diebstahl, vorsätzliches Fahren ohne Berechtigung, etc. |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 4. Dezember 2017, SGO 2017 22);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: