Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2017 74 • KG SZ STK 2017 74 Generato dall'IA

Prosecution Appeal on Negligent Harm Acquittal and Costs

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 74
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal by the prosecution against a district court judgment concerning negligent bodily harm and traffic law violations, specifically addressing the consequences regarding costs and compensation. The court reviewed the lower court's decision, which had acquitted the accused on the substantive charges, leading to a decision on the associated financial aspects of the proceedings. The appellate court upheld the lower court's outcome regarding the main charges, thereby implicitly confirming the associated cost and compensation rulings stemming from that initial verdict.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Prosecution Appeal on Negligent Harm Acquittal and Costs: The court reviewed the lower court's decision, which had acquitted the accused on the substantive charges, leading to a decision on the associated financial aspects of the proceedings. The appellate court upheld the lower court's outcome regarding the main charges, thereby implicitly confirming the associated cost and compensation rulings stemming from that initial verdict.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lesioni colpose infrazione alle norme della circolazione accollo delle spese anticipo delle spese quantificazione del danno azione penale
Generato dall'IA
STK 2016 47
Complainant v. Defendant (Negligent Bodily Harm Appeal)
STK 2019 38
Appeal Regarding Negligent Bodily Harm and Traffic Violations
STK 2020 5
Appeal of Negligent Bodily Harm Finding
STK 2017 47
Prosecution Appeal on Traffic Violation Acquittal
STK 2021 60
Prosecution's Withdrawal of Negligent Serious Bodily Harm Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 18. Januar 2018 \n STK 2017 74 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt A.________, gegen B.________, Beschuldigte und Berufungsgegnerin, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Fahrlässige Körperverletzung, SVG-Widerhandlungen (Kostenund Entschädigungsfolgen) |\n \n\n

\n (Urteil des Bezirksgerichts March vom 18. Dezember 2017, SGO 2017 1 [2. Rechtsgang]);- \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: