Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2017 73 • KG SZ STK 2017 73 Generato dall'IA

Private Prosecutor's Appeal Against Acquittal on Assault, Coercion, and False Accusation Charges Upheld

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 73
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal by a private prosecutor against a prior judgment regarding charges of simple assault, attempted coercion, false accusation, and a violation of foreign law, where the appellant sought the conviction of the accused on these counts. The court, in its decision, upheld the lower court's ruling, which had implicitly acquitted the accused on the various charges, as the appellate review confirmed that the factual findings and legal assessment leading to the dismissal of the private prosecutor's claims were appropriate and did not warrant reversal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private Prosecutor's Appeal Against Acquittal on Assault, Coercion, and False Accusation Charges Upheld: The court, in its decision, upheld the lower court's ruling, which had implicitly acquitted the accused on the various charges, as the appellate review confirmed that the factual findings and legal assessment leading to the dismissal of the private prosecutor's claims were appropriate and did not warrant reversal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
denuncia mendace tentata coazione azione penale privata abbandono per lesioni personali diritto estero difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico
Generato dall'IA
STK 2020 30
Private Prosecutor's Appeal on Defamation Conviction and Acquittal
BEK 2024 82
Private Appeal of Criminal Dismissal Upheld
STK 2020 15
Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Threats Acquittal Upheld)
STK 2022 75
Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Appeal of Acquittal for Brawling and Threats)
STK 2018 24
Private Prosecution Appeal: Negligent Grievous Bodily Harm Acquittal Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 16. Januar 2018 \n STK 2017 73 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n einfache Körperverletzung, versuchte Nötigung, falsche Anschuldigung und AuG |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 22. September 2017, SGO 2017 20);- \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: