Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld on Appeal
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant appealed a lower court's conviction for a serious traffic violation, which stemmed from an incident where the appellant was cited for the offense. The appellate court upheld the conviction, reasoning that the evidence presented sufficiently established the elements of the gross traffic violation, finding no error in the initial court's assessment of the facts or application of the law, thus confirming the original judgment.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IATraffic Violation Conviction Upheld on Appeal: The appellate court upheld the conviction, reasoning that the evidence presented sufficiently established the elements of the gross traffic violation, finding no error in the initial court's assessment of the facts or application of the law, thus confirming the original judgment.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Urteil vom 3. Juli 2018 \n STK 2017 71 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Bettina Krienbühl, Reto Fedrizzi, Dr. Stephan Zurfluh und Walter Christen, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n grobe Verkehrsregelverletzung |\n \n\n
\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 31. Mai 2017, SEO 2016 29);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: