Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2017 7 • KG SZ STK 2017 7 Generato dall'IA

Commercial Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 7
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant was convicted of commercial fraud following a second-instance appeal against a prior judgment. The case revolved around allegations of systematically obtaining financial advantage through deceptive conduct. The court upheld the conviction, implicitly finding sufficient evidence to confirm the elements of habitual or professional fraudulent activity as defined by law, thereby dismissing the appeal against the initial verdict.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Commercial Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal: The case revolved around allegations of systematically obtaining financial advantage through deceptive conduct. The court upheld the conviction, implicitly finding sufficient evidence to confirm the elements of habitual or professional fraudulent activity as defined by law, thereby dismissing the appeal against the initial verdict.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
truffa per mestiere truffa condotta precedente natura dell'infrazione verdetto di colpevolezza legittimazione a ricorrere gewerbsmässiger Betrug (2. Rechtsgang) | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 27. September 2017 \n STK 2017 7 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, \n amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n gewerbsmässiger Betrug (2. Rechtsgang) |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 24. Juli 2014, \n SGO 2013 36);-