State v. [Appellant Name] - Upholding Conviction for Threats, Insult, and Harassment
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn individual appealed a lower court's conviction for threats, insult, and intentional gross harassment. The appellate court reviewed the evidence, including witness testimony and the lower court's factual findings, and ultimately upheld the original conviction, finding that the initial assessment of the facts and the resulting legal application regarding the criminal offenses were sound and did not warrant interference upon appeal.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAState v. [Appellant Name] - Upholding Conviction for Threats, Insult, and Harassment: The appellate court reviewed the evidence, including witness testimony and the lower court's factual findings, and ultimately upheld the original conviction, finding that the initial assessment of the facts and the resulting legal application regarding the criminal offenses were sound and did not warrant interference upon appeal.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Urteil vom 25. September 2018 \n STK 2017 68 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Bettina Krienbühl, Jörg Meister und Hannelore Räber, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsführer und Anschlussberufungsgegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatkläger, Berufungsgegner und Anschlussberufungsführer, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Drohung, Beschimpfung, vorsätzliche grobe Belästigung |\n \n\n
\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Höfe vom 28. September 2017, SGO 2017 7);- \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: