Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2017 68 • KG SZ STK 2017 68 Generato dall'IA

State v. [Appellant Name] - Upholding Conviction for Threats, Insult, and Harassment

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 68
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a lower court's conviction for threats, insult, and intentional gross harassment. The appellate court reviewed the evidence, including witness testimony and the lower court's factual findings, and ultimately upheld the original conviction, finding that the initial assessment of the facts and the resulting legal application regarding the criminal offenses were sound and did not warrant interference upon appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

State v. [Appellant Name] - Upholding Conviction for Threats, Insult, and Harassment: The appellate court reviewed the evidence, including witness testimony and the lower court's factual findings, and ultimately upheld the original conviction, finding that the initial assessment of the facts and the resulting legal application regarding the criminal offenses were sound and did not warrant interference upon appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
minaccia nel diritto penale valutazione delle prove ingiuria testimonianza azione legale a scopo intimidatorio diffamazione Drohung, Beschimpfung, vorsätzliche grobe Belästigung | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 25. September 2018 \n STK 2017 68 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Bettina Krienbühl, Jörg Meister und Hannelore Räber, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsführer und Anschlussberufungsgegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatkläger, Berufungsgegner und Anschlussberufungsführer, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Drohung, Beschimpfung, vorsätzliche grobe Belästigung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Höfe vom 28. September 2017, SGO 2017 7);- \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: