State v. Defendant (Battery, Extortion, Deportation Appeal)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA defendant appealed a conviction for battery, insult, property damage, attempted extortion, and slander, which also involved a decision on deportation. The appellate court upheld the initial judgment, thereby confirming the conviction and associated penalty, because the appellant's arguments against the factual findings and legal assessment in the lower court's decision were found to be without merit, and the evidence sufficiently supported the established facts and subsequent legal conclusions regarding the criminal conduct and the appropriateness of the deportation order.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAState v. Defendant (Battery, Extortion, Deportation Appeal): The appellate court upheld the initial judgment, thereby confirming the conviction and associated penalty, because the appellant's arguments against the factual findings and legal assessment in the lower court's decision were found to be without merit, and the evidence sufficiently supported the established facts and subsequent legal conclusions regarding the criminal conduct and the appropriateness of the deportation order.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 7. Dezember 2017 \n STK 2017 67 \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n betreffend |\n Tätlichkeiten, Beschimpfung, Sachbeschädigung, versuchte Erpressung, Verleumdung, Landesverweisung |\n
\n\n
\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 28. September 2017, SGO 2017 13);- \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: