Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2017 66 • KG SZ STK 2017 66 Generato dall'IA

Appeal and Cross-Appeal Regarding Convictions for Theft, Fraud, False Accusation, and Related Offenses

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 66
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal and cross-appeal against a lower court's judgment concerning charges including theft, fraud, forgery, false accusation, coercion, and misuse of telecommunication facilities. The appellate court reviewed the conviction, which was based on the lower court's findings regarding the defendant's culpability for false accusation, among other offenses. The court's reasoning would detail its affirmation or modification of the initial conviction and sentencing based on the evidence and application of relevant criminal statutes to the established facts of the alleged criminal conduct.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Diebstahl, Betrug, Urkundenfälschung, falsche Anschuldigung, Nötigung (evtl. Sachentziehung, Abhören und Aufnehmen fremder Gespräche, Missbrauch einer Fernmeldeanlage und Drohung), Missbrauch einer Fernmeldeanlage und SVG (EGV-SZ 2018 A 4.4 | Strafgesetzbuch

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
furti connessi accusa di truffa truffa commisurazione della pena ripartizione delle spese coazione penale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 127 lit. a StPO
This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 2) concerning the costs to be borne by the appellant for the appeal proceedings.
Art. 127 lit. a i.V.m. Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 4) regarding the allocation of appeal costs.
Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 4) regarding the allocation of appeal costs.
Art. 422 Abs. 4 StPO
This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 3) concerning the non-application of an award of compensation to the private parties.
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 5) regarding the compensation of the defense costs.
Art. 427 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 6) regarding the allocation of court fees for the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 30
Appeal Concerning Conviction for Fraud and Document Forgery
STK 2022 59
Appeal and Cross-Appeal Regarding Fraud, Forgery, Bookkeeping Violations, and Deportation
STK 2022 1
Appeal and Cross-Appeal Regarding False Certification, Forgery, Fraud, and Money Laundering Convictions
STK 2022 40
Defendant Theft Conviction Appeal and Prosecution Cross-Appeal on Sentencing and Deportation
STK 2019 1
Appeal of Fraud Conviction

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 127 lit. a StPO

This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 2) concerning the costs to be borne by the appellant for the appeal proceedings.

Art. 127 lit. a i.V.m. Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 4) regarding the allocation of appeal costs.

Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 4) regarding the allocation of appeal costs.

Art. 422 Abs. 4 StPO

This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 3) concerning the non-application of an award of compensation to the private parties.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 5) regarding the compensation of the defense costs.

Art. 427 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision is cited in the dispositive (order 6) regarding the allocation of court fees for the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | |

|\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n

\n\n

\n

\n

\n

\n

\n

\n Urteil vom 19. Juni 2018

\n STK 2017 66

\n

\n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsführer und Anschlussberufungsgegner, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde, Berufungsgegnerin und Anschlussberufungsführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, 3. E.________ AG, 4. F.________, 5. G.________, 2.-5.: Privatklägerinnen und Berufungsgegnerinnen, |\n

\n\n

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Diebstahl, Betrug, Urkundenfälschung, falsche Anschuldigung, Nötigung (evtl. Sachentziehung, Abhören und Aufnehmen fremder Gespräche, Missbrauch einer Fernmeldeanlage und Drohung), Missbrauch einer Fernmeldeanlage und SVG |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des kantonalen Strafgerichts vom 6. Juli 2017, SGO 2017 7);-

\n

\n

\n hat die Strafkammer,

\n

\n

\n nachdem sich ergeben:

\n

\n A. Mit Urteil vom 6. Juli 2017 erkannte das kantonale Strafgericht in der Anklagesache der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 30. März 2017 gegen den Beschuldigten (kursiv: Gegenstand des Berufungsverfahrens, vgl. unten lit. B sowie E. 1):

\n

\n 1. A.________ wird schuldig gesprochen

\n *a)* *der falschen Anschuldigung im Sinne von*