Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2017 61 • KG SZ STK 2017 61 Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. Unfair Competition

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 61
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant was accused of unfair competition after engaging in commercially deceptive advertising practices that misled consumers. The court reasoned that the advertising in question created a misleading impression regarding the product's qualities and origin, thereby constituting an infringement of fair competition laws designed to protect both competitors and the public from dishonest commercial behavior, leading to the confirmation of the initial conviction for unfair competition.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. Unfair Competition: The court reasoned that the advertising in question created a misleading impression regarding the product's qualities and origin, thereby constituting an infringement of fair competition laws designed to protect both competitors and the public from dishonest commercial behavior, leading to the confirmation of the initial conviction for unfair competition.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
concorrenza sleale pratiche commerciali ingannevoli violazione civile del diritto al marchio pubblicità dell'appalto perenzione in diritto commerciale legislazione antidumping unlauterer Wettbewerb ( Art. 3 Abs. 1 lit. a UWG) | Übriges Strafrecht
Generato dall'IA
ZK1 2018 25
Appeal Regarding Personality Infringement under Unfair Competition Law
ZK1 2018 17
Appeal of Unfair Competition and Breach of Contract Judgment
STK 2019 79
Appeal Regarding Defamation and Unfair Competition Conviction
ZK1 2022 5
Unfair Competition Damages and Injunction Suit
BEK 2018 3
Criminal Prosecution Compensation Dispute Over Unfair Competition Claims

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n \n Urteil vom 12. Juni 2018 \n STK 2017 61 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl, Dr. Stephan Zurfluh und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigte und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | \n betreffend · \n unlauterer Wettbewerb (