Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2017 45 • KG SZ STK 2017 45 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Robbery Conviction and Official Defense Costs Calculation

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 45
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal and a complaint stemming from a lower court's judgment concerning robbery and the calculation of official defense costs. The appellant, facing charges related to robbery, contested the initial verdict, while a related complaint concerned the assessment of fees for the official defense counsel. The appellate court's decision, issued on April 18, 2018, addressed both the merits of the criminal conviction and the associated procedural cost determinations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 2 StPO, Art. 433 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO; Appeal of Robbery Conviction and Official Defense Costs Calculation: The appellant, facing charges related to robbery, contested the initial verdict, while a related complaint concerned the assessment of fees for the official defense counsel. The appellate court's decision, issued on April 18, 2018, addressed both the merits of the criminal conviction and the associated procedural cost determinations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rapina spese di difesa denuncia penale calcolo delle spese indennità di patrocinio difesa d'ufficio Raub etc. | Strafgesetzbuch

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 2 StPO

The court ordered the appellant to bear the costs of the appeal, referencing this provision.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The court ruled on the compensation for the private parties by ordering the appellant to pay them a fixed indemnity.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The appeal was rejected, leading to the appellant bearing the costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil und Beschluss vom 18. April 2018 \n STK 2017 45 und BEK 2017 129 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n I. STK 2017 45 A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch a.o. Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, 3. E.________, Ziff. 2-3 Privatkläger(in) und Berufungsgegner(in), beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt F.________, II. BEK 2017 129 B.________, Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Kantonales Strafgericht, Postfach 2267, Kollegiumstrasse 28, 6431 Schwyz, Beschwerdegegner, 2. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und weitere Verfahrensbeteiligte, vertreten durch a.o. Staatsanwalt C.________, 3. A.________, Beschuldigter und weiterer Verfahrensbeteiligter, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Raub etc., Entschädigungshöhe amtliche Verteidigung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung und Beschwerde gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 10. Februar 2017, SGO 2016 13);- \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: