Appeal and Cross-Appeal in Attempted Homicide Case
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case involves an appeal and cross-appeal against a lower court's judgment concerning attempted intentional homicide and related charges, where the appellant, originally the accused, challenged the original verdict. The appellate court reviewed the evidence and arguments presented in both the appeal and the cross-appeal filed by the cantonal prosecution and the private parties, ultimately reaching a final decision on the nature and extent of the defendant's culpability concerning the serious charges.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 429 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO; Appeal and Cross-Appeal in Attempted Homicide Case: The appellate court reviewed the evidence and arguments presented in both the appeal and the cross-appeal filed by the cantonal prosecution and the private parties, ultimately reaching a final decision on the nature and extent of the defendant's culpability concerning the serious charges.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe defendant must bear the costs of the appeal procedure because his appeal was dismissed.
The State Prosecutor must bear the costs of the appeal procedure because her appeal was granted.
The private plaintiffs must bear the costs of the appeal procedure because their appeals were dismissed.
Testo completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Urteil vom 18. April 2018 \n STK 2017 44 \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsführer und Anschlussberufungsgegner, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde, Berufungsgegnerin und Anschlussberufungsführerin, vertreten durch a.o. Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, 3. E.________, Ziff. 2-3 Privatkläger(in) und Berufungsgegner(in), beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt F.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n versuchte vorsätzliche Tötung etc. |\n \n\n
\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 10. Februar 2017, SGO 2016 12);- \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: