Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2017 29 • KG SZ STK 2017 29 Generato dall'IA

Appeal and Cross-Appeal in Arson Conviction

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 29
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal and cross-appeal against a prior criminal court judgment regarding arson. The appellate court reviewed the initial conviction, which found the appellant guilty of arson, and considered arguments from both the prosecution and the defense concerning the evidence and the degree of culpability. The court reasoned that the evidence sufficiently supported the finding that the accused intentionally set the fire, upholding the conviction while potentially adjusting the penalty based on the specific findings during the second instance review of the factual basis and legal assessment of the criminal act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal and Cross-Appeal in Arson Conviction: The appellate court reviewed the initial conviction, which found the appellant guilty of arson, and considered arguments from both the prosecution and the defense concerning the evidence and the degree of culpability. The court reasoned that the evidence sufficiently supported the finding that the accused intentionally set the fire, upholding the conviction while potentially adjusting the penalty based on the specific findings during the second instance review of the factual basis and legal assessment of the criminal act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
incendio intenzionale azione penale valutazione delle prove allegazione motivata impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio revisione in materia penale Brandstiftung (2. Rechtsgang) | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
STK 2018 7
Negligent Arson and Endangerment Conviction Upheld
STK 2018 8
State v. Defendant: Reversal of Negligent Arson Conviction Due to Insufficient Causation
STK 2017 16
Appeals Concerning Attempted Homicide and Assault Conviction
STK 2017 66
Appeal and Cross-Appeal Regarding Convictions for Theft, Fraud, False Accusation, and Related Offenses
STK 2023 71
Negligent Fire Causation Appeal Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Urteil vom 10. August 2017 \n STK 2017 29 \n \n

\n\n| | | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl, Dr. Stephan Zurfluh und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n |\n

\n|\n In Sachen |\n Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, \n Anklagebehörde, Berufungsführerin und Anschlussberufungsgegnerin, \n vertreten durch Staatsanwältin A.________, |\n |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Brandstiftung (2. Rechtsgang) |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des kantonalen Strafgerichts vom 17. März 2016, SGO 2016 2);- \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: