Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2017 28 • KG SZ STK 2017 28 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Breach of Professional Secrecy Conviction

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 28
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a lower court conviction for breach of professional secrecy, where the initial judgment found the appellant criminally liable for disclosing confidential information. The appellate court reviewed the appeal against the judgment of the single judge of the District Court, concerning the violation of professional secrecy, ultimately deciding on the merits of the appeal brought by the accused and appellant against the opposing private plaintiffs and the public prosecutor's office.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO, Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 431 Abs. 2 StPO, Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 433 Abs. 3 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 StPO; Appeal of Breach of Professional Secrecy Conviction: The appellate court reviewed the appeal against the judgment of the single judge of the District Court, concerning the violation of professional secrecy, ultimately deciding on the merits of the appeal brought by the accused and appellant against the opposing private plaintiffs and the public prosecutor's office.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violazione del segreto professionale spese di procedura violazioni delle norme procedurali violazione dell'ordine pubblico reati contro la sfera personale riservata principio di pubblicità Verletzung des Berufsgeheimnisses | Strafgesetzbuch

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO
The appeal was partially accepted and the judgment was modified based on this provision regarding the factual and legal assessment.
Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO
The appeal was partially accepted, leading to a modification of the costs.
Art. 431 Abs. 2 StPO
The court ordered the state/canton to bear the procedural costs due to the partial acceptance of the appeal.
Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO
The court ordered the private parties (D. and E.) to pay their own procedural costs incurred during the appeal.
Art. 433 Abs. 3 StPO
The court ordered the private parties (D. and E.) to pay compensation to the appellant (A.____) for the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.
Art. 429 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to rule on the distribution of costs in light of the partial success of the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 107
Appeal Regarding Non-Initiation of Proceedings for Breach of Professional Secrecy by Former Defense Attorney
BEK 2022 132
Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Investigation into Attorney's Breach of Professional Secrecy in Fee Dispute Documentation
BEK 2022 97
Private Complainant Standing to Appeal Discontinuation of Secrecy Violation Proceedings
BEK 2023 173
Private Complainants v. Public Prosecutor Regarding Lawyer's Alleged Breach of Professional Secrecy
BEK 2020 169
Appeal Against Refusal to Prosecute Official Secrecy Violation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

The appeal was partially accepted and the judgment was modified based on this provision regarding the factual and legal assessment.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal was partially accepted, leading to a modification of the costs.

Art. 431 Abs. 2 StPO

The court ordered the state/canton to bear the procedural costs due to the partial acceptance of the appeal.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO

The court ordered the private parties (D. and E.) to pay their own procedural costs incurred during the appeal.

Art. 433 Abs. 3 StPO

The court ordered the private parties (D. and E.) to pay compensation to the appellant (A.____) for the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to rule on the distribution of costs in light of the partial success of the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 12. Dezember 2017 \n STK 2017 28 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, 3. E.________, Ziff. 2 und 3 Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt F.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Verletzung des Berufsgeheimnisses |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 9. März 2017, SEO 2016 39);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n