Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2017 20 • KG SZ STK 2017 20 Generato dall'IA

DUI and Obstruction of Blood Sample Appeal

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a district court judgment concerning charges of driving under the influence and obstructing a blood sample, where the core issue was whether the lower court correctly applied the relevant traffic law provisions regarding impairment and refusal of testing. The reviewing court upheld the conviction, reasoning that the evidence sufficiently established the appellant's state of impairment at the time of driving, and that the factual circumstances surrounding the refusal to submit to a blood test justified the conviction under the statute prohibiting the vitiation of such testing.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

DUI and Obstruction of Blood Sample Appeal: The reviewing court upheld the conviction, reasoning that the evidence sufficiently established the appellant's state of impairment at the time of driving, and that the factual circumstances surrounding the refusal to submit to a blood test justified the conviction under the statute prohibiting the vitiation of such testing.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prova del sangue esame dell'alito guida in stato di ebbrezza qualificata guida in stato di inattitudine abbandono del procedimento per infrazione stradale illecita violenza
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 123
Appeal Against Blood Test Order for Driving Impairment
STK 2021 27
R. v. Smith: Appeal of Conviction for Obstruction of Intoxication Testing and Driving Without License
BEK 2019 1
Appeal Dismissal for Failure to Remedy Deficiencies in DWI Test Order Challenge
STK 2019 45
Appeal of Impaired Driving Conviction Upheld
STK 2018 41
State v. Defendant (Driving While Impaired Appeal)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 5. Mai 2017 \n STK 2017 20 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, \n verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n SVG, Fahren in fahrunfähigem Zustand und Vereitelung der Blutprobe |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Schwyz vom 27. Januar 2017, SEO 2016 37);- \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: