Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
STK 2017 11 • KG SZ STK 2017 11 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Conviction for Bodily Harm, Assault, and Threat

Numero d'incarto STK 2017 11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant, previously convicted by a cantonal criminal court for bodily harm, assault, and threat, appealed the decision. The appellate court, having reviewed the case concerning the charges of physical injury, battery, and threats, proceeded to issue its judgment on the appeal against the initial ruling from the previous year.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Conviction for Bodily Harm, Assault, and Threat: The appellate court, having reviewed the case concerning the charges of physical injury, battery, and threats, proceeded to issue its judgment on the appeal against the initial ruling from the previous year.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lesioni personali minaccia impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio commisurazione della pena reati contro il patrimonio querela Vergewaltigung, Körperverletzung, Tätlichkeiten, Drohung | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Urteil vom 28. November 2017 \n STK 2017 11 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, unentgeltlich vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Körperverletzung, Tätlichkeiten, Drohung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des kantonalen Strafgerichts vom 24. November 2016, SGO 2016 19);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: