Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2016 46 • KG SZ STK 2016 46 Generato dall'IA

Prosecution v. Accused: Reversal of Intentional Animal Cruelty Verdict

Numero d'incarto STK 2016 46
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal by the prosecution against a lower court's decision regarding multiple counts of intentional animal cruelty. The appellate court reviewed the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the accused, ultimately upholding the appeal and concluding that the actions committed by the accused constituted the offense as charged, thereby reversing the original verdict.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 423 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO; Prosecution v. Accused: Reversal of Intentional Animal Cruelty Verdict: The appellate court reviewed the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the accused, ultimately upholding the appeal and concluding that the actions committed by the accused constituted the offense as charged, thereby reversing the original verdict.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale verdetto di colpevolezza apprezzamento arbitrario delle prove interpretazione della sentenza delitto preterintenzionale esame delle censure formali mehrfache vorsätzliche Tierquälerei | Übriges Strafrecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 423 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision was used to dismiss the appeal.
Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO
This procedural rule was used to reject the appeal as unfounded.
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
This provision was applied to rule on the costs of the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 35
Appeal Regarding Animal Cruelty Conviction
STK 2022 46
Appeal of Willful Animal Cruelty and Welfare Violations Conviction
BEK 2020 92
Animal Protection Law Violation Appeal Modification
BEK 2022 76
Appeal Regarding Intentional Animal Protection Law Violations
STK 2017 30
Prosecution Appeal Regarding Animal Protection and Traffic Law Violations

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 423 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision was used to dismiss the appeal.

Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO

This procedural rule was used to reject the appeal as unfounded.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

This provision was applied to rule on the costs of the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 13. Oktober 2017 \n STK 2016 46 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Dr. Stephan Zurfluh, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt A.________, gegen B.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsgegner, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n mehrfache vorsätzliche Tierquälerei |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 4. November 2016, SEO 2016 30);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: