Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2016 36 • KG SZ STK 2016 36 Generato dall'IA

Commercial Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal

Numero d'incarto STK 2016 36
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a conviction for commercial fraud where the accused appealed the lower court's judgment. The court upheld the conviction, reasoning that the totality of the evidence, including established facts regarding the accused's actions and intent, sufficiently supported the finding of commercial fraud as determined by the original trial court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Commercial Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal: The court upheld the conviction, reasoning that the totality of the evidence, including established facts regarding the accused's actions and intent, sufficiently supported the finding of commercial fraud as determined by the original trial court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
truffa per mestiere truffa natura dell'infrazione fissazione della multa legittimazione a ricorrere procedimento per falsità gewerbsmässiger Betrug | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
STK 2017 7
Commercial Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal
STK 2019 32
Appellate Review of Commercial Fraud Conviction
STK 2021 7
Appeal of Professional Fraud Conviction Upheld
STK 2021 50
Appeal of Habitual Fraud and Forgery Conviction Upheld
STK 2022 56
Theft and Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 6. Februar 2018 \n STK 2016 36 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl, Dr. Stephan Zurfluh und Dr. Veronika Bürgler Trutmann, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n gewerbsmässiger Betrug |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 28. April 2016, SGO 2016 5);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: