Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2016 28 • KG SZ STK 2016 28 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Conviction for Threats, Harm, Battery, Insult, and Weapons Violation

Numero d'incarto STK 2016 28
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a lower court's judgment concerning multiple charges including threats, simple bodily harm, battery, insult, and violation of weapons law. The appellant, the accused, challenged the previous conviction. The appellate court reviewed the evidence and arguments presented in the appeal concerning the criminal acts and the application of the law to those facts.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO, Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 431 Abs. 2 StPO, Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO; Appeal Regarding Conviction for Threats, Harm, Battery, Insult, and Weapons Violation: The appellant, the accused, challenged the previous conviction. The appellate court reviewed the evidence and arguments presented in the appeal concerning the criminal acts and the application of the law to those facts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
minaccia infrazione alla legge sulle armi lesioni personali ingiuria reati contro il patrimonio commisurazione della pena

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO
This provision determines the main ground for dismissing the appeal in the dispositive.
Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO
This procedural rule is applied in the dispositive concerning the jurisdiction of the court.
Art. 431 Abs. 2 StPO
This procedural rule is applied in the dispositive regarding the final nature of the decision.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO
This article is cited in the dispositive to regulate the distribution of procedural costs for the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2017 11
Appeal Against Conviction for Bodily Harm, Assault, and Threat
STK 2020 43
Appeal Regarding Bodily Harm, Battery, and Confiscation
STK 2023 78
Appeal of Conviction for Threat and Insult
STK 2020 45
Appeal of Conviction for Multiple Offenses Including Domestic Violence and Threats Against Officials
STK 2019 10
Criminal Appeal on Bodily Harm, Threats, and Related Charges

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

This provision determines the main ground for dismissing the appeal in the dispositive.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

This procedural rule is applied in the dispositive concerning the jurisdiction of the court.

Art. 431 Abs. 2 StPO

This procedural rule is applied in the dispositive regarding the final nature of the decision.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO

This article is cited in the dispositive to regulate the distribution of procedural costs for the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 14. November 2017 \n STK 2016 28 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Bettina Krienbühl, Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, 3. E.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, \n vertr. durch F.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n mehrfache Drohung, einfache Körperverletzung, Tätlichkeiten, Beschimpfung und Widerhandlung gegen das Waffengesetz |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Einsiedeln vom 11. Dezember 2013, SGO 2013 001);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: