Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2016 27 • KG SZ STK 2016 27 Generato dall'IA

State v. [Appellant Name] (Theft Conviction Affirmation)

Numero d'incarto STK 2016 27
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a conviction for theft where the accused appealed the verdict. The initial conviction was based on circumstantial evidence suggesting the appellant was the perpetrator of the theft. The court, in upholding the conviction, reasoned that the totality of the circumstantial evidence presented in the record was sufficient to establish the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, thereby affirming the judgment of the lower court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

State v. [Appellant Name] (Theft Conviction Affirmation): The initial conviction was based on circumstantial evidence suggesting the appellant was the perpetrator of the theft. The court, in upholding the conviction, reasoned that the totality of the circumstantial evidence presented in the record was sufficient to establish the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, thereby affirming the judgment of the lower court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indizio imputazione di furto verdetto di colpevolezza fissazione della multa procedimento per falsità natura dell'infrazione Diebstahl (Art. 139 Ziff. 1 StGB); 2. Rechtsgang | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
STK 2018 17
Defendant v. State: Affirmation of Fraud and Forgery Conviction
STK 2018 50
Appellant v. State: Appeal Against Theft and Trespassing Conviction
STK 2022 56
Theft and Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal
STK 2023 53
Theft, Damage, and Trespassing Conviction Upheld on Appeal Despite Partial Remand of Civil Claims
STK 2019 41
Appeal of Embezzlement Conviction Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 13. Dezember 2016 \n STK 2016 27 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl, Dr. Stephan Zurfluh und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, \n erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n betreffend · \n Diebstahl (