Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2025 53 • VG SZ III 2025 53 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Increased Development Density Approval

Numero d'incarto III 2025 53
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against decisions by lower administrative bodies concerning a development plan adjustment that significantly increased the buildable area on a property, which the appellant argued infringed upon their property rights and violated procedural rules, particularly regarding public consultation and the assessment of environmental impacts. The court reasoned that the lower administrative bodies had correctly interpreted the relevant planning laws concerning density allowances and that the procedural requirements, including the degree of public participation and the environmental review, met the necessary legal standards, thereby dismissing the appeal as unfounded.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Increased Development Density Approval: The court reasoned that the lower administrative bodies had correctly interpreted the relevant planning laws concerning density allowances and that the procedural requirements, including the degree of public participation and the environmental review, met the necessary legal standards, thereby dismissing the appeal as unfounded.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
approvazione dei piani incentivazione immobiliare presupposto processuale esame di impatto ambientale utilizzazione del fondo diritto allo sviluppo Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited in the final order to regulate the distribution of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2016 108
Appeal Against Development Plan Approval Quashed Due to Excessive Zoning Deviation
III 2023 5
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning Approval of Commercial Development
III 2018 9
Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2020 110
Appeal Regarding Denial of Building Permit Due to Non-Compliance with Spatial Planning Regulations

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited in the final order to regulate the distribution of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2025 53 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Oktober 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, \n Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n