Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2025 31 • VG SZ III 2025 31 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Ex Officio Deletion of Sole Proprietorship from Commercial Register

Numero d'incarto III 2025 31
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against the ex officio deletion of a sole proprietorship from the commercial register by the relevant authority. The appellant sought to prevent this deletion, arguing that the business was still active, despite evidence suggesting otherwise or a lack of necessary compliance. The court reasoned that the decision to delete a sole proprietorship from the commercial register ex officio is based on specific legal criteria, often relating to the cessation of business activity or failure to meet formal obligations; the court upheld the deletion because the factual basis for the administrative action, as determined by the lower instance, satisfied the statutory requirements for removal, thereby affirming the lower authority's decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Appeal Against Ex Officio Deletion of Sole Proprietorship from Commercial Register: The appellant sought to prevent this deletion, arguing that the business was still active, despite evidence suggesting otherwise or a lack of necessary compliance. The court reasoned that the decision to delete a sole proprietorship from the commercial register ex officio is based on specific legal criteria, often relating to the cessation of business activity or failure to meet formal obligations; the court upheld the deletion because the factual basis for the administrative action, as determined by the lower instance, satisfied the statutory requirements for removal, thereby affirming the lower authority's decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
registro di commercio azione in revoca ditta individuale vita aziendale base legale scioglimento di una Sagl

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The appellant is ordered to pay the judicial costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2025 31 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Mai 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Handelsregister Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1185, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Handelsregister (Löschung eines Einzelunternehmens von Amtes wegen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: