Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2025 114 • VG SZ III 2025 114 Generato dall'IA

Pier Permit Retroactivity and Removal Dispute

Numero d'incarto III 2025 114
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a retroactive building permit granted for a pier facility, which was subject to a condition requiring its removal, as this was the second instance of appeal regarding this matter. The court reviewed the decision concerning planning and building law, specifically addressing the subsequent approval of the structure and its mandated dismantling, ultimately upholding the prior ruling in the second stage of the legal proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Pier Permit Retroactivity and Removal Dispute: The court reviewed the decision concerning planning and building law, specifically addressing the subsequent approval of the structure and its mandated dismantling, ultimately upholding the prior ruling in the second stage of the legal proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia a posteriori approvazione dei piani retroattività della legge oggetto della lite allontanamento ritiro dell'autorizzazione
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 55
Building Permit Dispute After Project Modification
III 2024 22
Subsequent Permit Application and Compliance with Current Building Law
III 2022 91
Appeal Regarding Retroactive Building Permit Denial for Lakeside Patio and Garden Expansion
III 2020 166
District Council Building Permit Retroactive Approval Challenge
III 2021 92
Enforcement of Building Permit Procedure and Usage Halt Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2025 114 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. Juli 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, 2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Nachträgliche Baubewilligung für Steganlage; Rückbau), 2. Rechtsgang zu VGE III 2023 5 |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: