Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2025 113 • VG SZ III 2025 113 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Road Usage Plan Designation

Numero d'incarto III 2025 113
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a local council's decision and a subsequent cantonal government's decision concerning a road usage plan (Wegrodelplan for District 4), which affects access rights for vehicles on a specific path. The court reasoned that the administrative act detailing the path's designation for non-vehicular use, which was the subject of the appeal, was issued in accordance with established public law procedures, concluding that the complaints regarding procedural errors and the substance of the road designation were unfounded, thus affirming the lower administrative decisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Road Usage Plan Designation: The court reasoned that the administrative act detailing the path's designation for non-vehicular use, which was the subject of the appeal, was issued in accordance with established public law procedures, concluding that the complaints regarding procedural errors and the substance of the road designation were unfounded, thus affirming the lower administrative decisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
strada d'accesso diritto di utilizzazione giustizia di prossimità impugnazione di decisioni amministrative amministrazione locale piano viario Strassenwesen (Wegrodel; Wegrodelplan Kreis 4) | Verschiedenes
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 47
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Service Road Designation
III 2018 126
Road Contribution Classification and Infrastructure Scope Appeal
III 2020 203
Challenge to Planning Decision Admissibility
III 2022 46
Corporate Road Access Dispute Against District and Cantonal Authorities
III 2022 158
Land Use Designation Appeal Affirmed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2025 113 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. August 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Gemeinderat Unteriberg, Waagtalstrasse 27, Postfach 46, 8842 Unteriberg, 2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenwesen (Wegrodel; Wegrodelplan Kreis 4) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: