Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2025 100 • VG SZ III 2025 100 Generato dall'IA

Corporation's Appeal on Spatial Planning Dismissed for Lack of Standing

Numero d'incarto III 2025 100
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A corporation appealed a decision by lower administrative bodies concerning spatial planning, specifically challenging the approvals granted to another corporation and numerous individuals regarding their properties. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant lacked the requisite standing to challenge the zoning and development decisions because it could not demonstrate a sufficiently direct or specific impact on its own legally protected interests, as is required for such appeals in spatial planning matters.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Corporation's Appeal on Spatial Planning Dismissed for Lack of Standing: The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant lacked the requisite standing to challenge the zoning and development decisions because it could not demonstrate a sufficiently direct or specific impact on its own legally protected interests, as is required for such appeals in spatial planning matters.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legittimazione a ricorrere approvazione dei piani impugnazione di decisioni amministrative interesse giuridicamente protetto difetto di legittimazione dell'azionista legittimazione a contestare licenza Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung), 2. Rechtsgang | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The provision was cited for the allocation of court costs upon the rejection of the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 211
Corporation Planning Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing
III 2024 104
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing to Challenge Development Plan
III 2024 189
Planning Appeal Against Administrative Decision and Corporate Interests
III 2017 234
Planning Law Standing Appeal Dismissed
III 2023 5
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning Approval of Commercial Development

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The provision was cited for the allocation of court costs upon the rejection of the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2025 100 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Juni 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Jeremias Fellmann, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. B.________ AG, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. C.________, \n2. D.________, \n3. E.________, \n4. F.________, \n5. G.________, \n6. H.________, \n7. I.________, \n8. J.________ AG, \n9. K.________, \n10. L.________, \n11. M.________, \n12. N.________, \n13. O.________, \n14. P.________, \n15. Q.________, \n16. R.________, \n17. S.________, \n18. T.________, \n19. U.________, \n20. V.________, \n Beigeladene, |\n

\n\n

\n