Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 86 • VG SZ III 2024 86 Generato dall'IA

Prisoner Sentence Execution Regime Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2024 86
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A person currently incarcerated filed an appeal against the decision of the prison authority concerning the execution of their sentence. The core issue involved the proper application of rules governing the penitentiary regime, specifically regarding the individual's legal status or conditions during imprisonment. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the established procedures and legal framework for the execution of the sentence were correctly applied by the prison administration in determining the appellant's circumstances.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Prisoner Sentence Execution Regime Appeal: The core issue involved the proper application of rules governing the penitentiary regime, specifically regarding the individual's legal status or conditions during imprisonment. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the established procedures and legal framework for the execution of the sentence were correctly applied by the prison administration in determining the appellant's circumstances.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
detenuto differimento dell'esecuzione della pena controllo della commisurazione della pena diritti del detenuto decisione quadro gerenza forzata Strafvollzug (Vollzugsauftrag für Strafen) | Strafvollzug
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 113
Appeal Against Definitive Execution Authorization Between Municipalities
III 2022 108
Appeal Dismissed Against Execution of Substitute Prison Sentence for Unpaid Fines
III 2019 18
Petitioner's Consent to Sentence Execution Bars Appeal
STK 2023 32
Suspended Sentence Revocation Appeal and Probation Extension
BEK 2023 67
Appeal Against Detention Upheld Due to Inadmissibility

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 86 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. Juli 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n z.Zt. im Strafvollzug, B.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Amt für Justizvollzug, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg SSB, \n Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n