Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 81 • VG SZ III 2024 81 Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Administrative Decision on Compulsory Right-of-Way Easement Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2024 81
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The petitioners challenged a cantonal administrative decision concerning the extension of a public right-of-way easement over their property, which was sought by a property owner to ensure access to a municipal road, arguing that the existing access arrangement was insufficient for the intended agricultural and forestry use of their land. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative bodies correctly determined that the proposed extension of the right-of-way was necessary to ensure adequate access for the legitimate use of the servient property and that the burden imposed on the servient estate was not disproportionate to the benefit conferred on the dominant estate, thus satisfying the requirements for establishing a compulsory easement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Administrative Decision on Compulsory Right-of-Way Easement Upheld: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative bodies correctly determined that the proposed extension of the right-of-way was necessary to ensure adequate access for the legitimate use of the servient property and that the burden imposed on the servient estate was not disproportionate to the benefit conferred on the dominant estate, thus satisfying the requirements for establishing a compulsory easement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servitù diritto di passo necessario terreno comunale strada d'accesso diritto di visita diritto acquisito Planungs- und Baurecht (nachträgliche Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2024 1
Cantonal Road Widening and Zoning Revision Upheld
III 2023 31
Cantonal Land Use Planning Appeal Decision Upheld
III 2023 196
Property Owners' Access Rights Over Private Road Upheld
III 2022 158
Land Use Designation Appeal Affirmed
III 2022 24
Appeal Against Cantonal Administrative Decision Affirmed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 81 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Mai 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt M.A. HSG C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n3. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. E.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n