Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 67 • VG SZ III 2024 67 Generato dall'IA

Municipality, Corporation, and PLC v. Cantonal Government and Municipal Council Appeals

Numero d'incarto III 2024 67
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Three entities, a municipality, a corporation, and a public limited company, appealed a decision by the cantonal government and the municipal council, with the municipality also being a respondent in two of the appeals, regarding an underlying administrative matter; the court dismissed all three appeals, implicitly upholding the prior governmental decisions, as the challenges presented by the appellants did not demonstrate sufficient grounds to overturn the rulings of the lower administrative bodies.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Planungs- und Baurecht (Teilrevision Nutzungsplanung - Ausscheidung Gewässerraum/Gewässerbaulinie [RRB Nr.294/2024]) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
e-government ordinanze municipali elezioni locali surrogazione dell'ente pubblico SRL = Società a responsabilità limitata corporazione di diritto pubblico
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 24
Appeal Against Cantonal Administrative Decision Affirmed
III 2021 81
Appeal Between Municipalities Concerning Cantonal Government Involvement
III 2022 89
Companies v. Municipality and Cantonal Authorities on Land Use
III 2019 113
Appeal Against Municipal Council Decision
III 2010 115
Administrative Appeal Against District and Cantonal Council Decisions

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 67 III 2024 68 III 2024 69 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. März 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. Gemeinde Freienbach, vertreten durch den Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, \n Beschwerdeführerin (Verfahren III 2024 67), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. A.________ \n2. Korporation Pfäffikon, Hurdnerwäldlistrasse 27a, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, \n Beschwerdeführerin (Verfahren III 2024 68), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, \n3. C.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin (Verfahren III 2024 69), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. D.________, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. A.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen (Verfahren III 2024 67, 68 und 69) |\n

\n\n

\n