Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 58 • VG SZ III 2024 58 Generato dall'IA

Environmental Regulation Compliance vs. Operational Burden

Numero d'incarto III 2024 58
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a governmental decree mandating the use of trailing hose technology for slurry application, arguing that this requirement unfairly burdened their farming operations due to topography and size, which they claimed made compliance impractical and economically damaging. The court upheld the decree, reasoning that the regulation serves the essential public interest of environmental protection, specifically preventing nutrient runoff into water bodies, and that the imposed measure is a proportionate means of achieving this goal, despite the specific operational difficulties asserted by the petitioner, as the general environmental benefit outweighs the individual burden.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Environmental Regulation Compliance vs. Operational Burden: The court upheld the decree, reasoning that the regulation serves the essential public interest of environmental protection, specifically preventing nutrient runoff into water bodies, and that the imposed measure is a proportionate means of achieving this goal, despite the specific operational difficulties asserted by the petitioner, as the general environmental benefit outweighs the individual burden.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
protezione delle acque norma ambientale tutela dell'interesse pubblico gestione delle risorse controllo dell'inquinamento regolamenti di attuazione Umweltschutzrecht (Landwirtschaft: Schleppschlauchpflicht) | Umweltschutzrecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2024 95
Appeal Against Refusal of Exception to Mandatory Drag Hose Slurry Application
III 2023 204
Refueling Station Drainage Modernization Upheld Despite Retroactivity Claims
STK 2021 9
Unpermitted Construction and Environmental Violations Appeal
III 2024 31
Landfill Permit Extension Upheld Despite Environmental and Traffic Safety Challenges
III 2024 3
Challenge to Building Permit Zoning Compliance

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 58 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Landwirtschaft, Hirschistrasse 15, Postfach 5182, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Umweltschutzrecht (Landwirtschaft: Schleppschlauchpflicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: