Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 40 • VG SZ III 2024 40 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Asylum Facility Procurement Award Decision Annulment

Numero d'incarto III 2024 40
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company appealed a procurement authority's decision regarding the award of general planning services (SIA Phases 32, 33, 41, 51, 52, 53) for the replacement construction of an asylum facility, where the initial award decision was successfully challenged by a competitor in a lower court. The appeal concerned whether the lower court erred in finding that the award decision was flawed based on the assessment of the competing bids. The court ultimately found no basis to overturn the lower court's reasoned decision, which had concluded that the initial award criteria were misapplied or that the evaluation process introduced an unjustified disparity between the competitors, thus upholding the annulment of the original award.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Öffentliches Beschaffungsrecht (Vergabeentscheid D._________: Ersatzbau Asylunterkunft E:__________; Generalplanerleistungen für die SIA-Phasen 32, 33, 41, 51, 52, 53) | Öffentliches Beschaffungsrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
valutazione delle offerte revisione in materia d'asilo imprese di costruzione annullamento del lodo arbitrale criteri di aggiudicazione esclusione dalla procedura di appalto
Generato dall'IA
III 2025 33
Procurement Award Annulled Due to Failure to Evaluate Permitted Variant Offer
III 2018 67
Public Contract Award Appeal: Exclusion of Lowest Bidder Reversed
III 2022 139
Public Procurement Appeal Over Flawed Civil Engineering Works Award
III 2018 169
Supervisory Annulment of Preliminary Planning Decision
III 2024 53
Appeal Dismissed Over Building Permit Annulment Due to Development Plan Violation

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 40 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Juni 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Bezirk C.________, handelnd durch den Bezirksrat, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Öffentliches Beschaffungsrecht (Vergabeentscheid D.________: \n Ersatzbau Asylunterkunft E.________; Generalplaner­ \n leistungen für die SIA-Phasen 32, 33, 41, 51, 52, 53) |\n

\n\n

\n

Sachverhalt: